Hearing of Ayodhya Case

Supreme Court- Will Hear Ayodhya Case As “Pure Land Dispute”

The case over the 2.7 section of land debated Ayodhya site asserted by the two Hindus and Muslims will be taken up by the Supreme Court on March 14. A three-judge seat of the best court headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, which put off the hearings anticipated that would begin today likewise, has underlined […]

Continue Reading
ram mandir

Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid issue- Ayodhya Dispute Summary

What is the long-standing Ayodhya/Ram Mandir dispute all about? The Ayodhya dispute is a political, verifiable and socio-religious verbal confrontation in India, focused on a plot of land in the city of Ayodhya, situated in Faizabad locale, Uttar Pradesh. The primary issues rotate around access to a site generally respected among Hindus to be the […]

Continue Reading
Kesavananda Bharati

Case Study: Kesavananda Bharati vs State Of Kerala And Anr

Case Study: Kesavananda Bharati  vs State Of Kerala And Anr  24 April, 1973 Name of the case – Kesavananda Bharati … vs State Of Kerala And Anr Equivalent Citations- (1973) 4 SCC 225)  INTRODUCTION –  Kesavananda Bharati  vs State Of Kerala –This is the greatest decision in the history of the Indian constitution which determined the fabric […]

Continue Reading
Municipal Corporations and Contractors

Case Study: Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr vs State Of U. P. & Ors

          Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr vs State Of U. P. & Ors                                                              On 27 May, 2008 JURISDICTION IN THE HONURABLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA […]

Continue Reading
K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra

Case Study on Landmark Judgment: K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra, 1961(Rustom Movie)

K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra on 24 November, 1961 Commander K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra was a 1959 Indian court case where Commander Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati, a Naval Commander, was tried for the murder of Prem Ahuja, his wife’s lover. The incident received unprecedented media coverage and inspired several books and films such as the […]

Continue Reading
cbe0ff10 aef9 4f30 aeb2 61c0c44cf24a

Turning point for India: Supreme Court’s triple talaq judgment sets the country on course to a uniform civil code

Last week’s landmark judgment by a Supreme Court Constitution Bench, outlawing instant Triple Talaq divorce by Muslim men, is a turning point for the Indian republic and the very idea of India. That is despite the ruling being a hesitant, split verdict. Admittedly, not everyone agrees with this assessment, and some even trivialize the parallels […]

Continue Reading
Dera Chief Ram Rahim

Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim found guilty of rape, taken into judicial custody, Violence breaks out

HIGHLIGHTS The court’s verdict in the case against the 50-year-old Dera chief came after 14 years In 2002, a Dera sadhvi wrote an anonymous letter to then PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee saying she was raped by the Dera chief The verdict was delivered amid unprecedented security as thousands of Dera followers gathered in Panchkula 5 […]

Continue Reading
CGHS Cover

SUPREME COURT- Right to Privacy is a fundamental right, rules Supreme Court

In a landmark judgement, the SC has ruled that the right to privacy is a fundamental right. It overruled the famous MP Sharma case, in which an eight-judge bench had ruled that privacy isn’t a fundamental right. “Right to Privacy is intrinsic to the Right to Life,” it observed. How did the case on privacy […]

Continue Reading
Triple Talaq

SUPREME COURT- SC Declares Triple Talaq Practice ‘Unconstitutional’ With 3:2 Majority

The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside the practice of instant triple talaq saying it was violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Three judges on the 5 judge Constitution bench decided against triple talaq while two ruled in favor. Justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman and U U Lalit said triple […]

Continue Reading
Indra Sawhney & Others Vs.Union Of India-

LANDMARK CASE- Indra Sawhney & Others Vs.Union Of India

Indra Sawhney & Others Vs.Union Of India- When our own intention to provide equal opportunity in the public employment to all the citizens within INDIA. The same was inserted in the Art. 16 of the Indian Constitution. But considering the backward classes, a special provision was inserted in the same Art. In clause 4 i.e., in Art. […]

Continue Reading